Fiona Eldridge and Dr Sabine Dembkowski
ten success factors for bringing it to life
Creating a coaching culture:
There are key success factors which should form part of the planning
process, and which can be used as a framework for organisations about
to embark on the implementation of a coaching culture.
Coach the Coach
Coaching today
Coach the Coach • Issue 4
Coach the Coach • ©Fenman Limited 2004
Coaching is subject to much media
attention, and the use of coaching
within organisations has increased
significantly in Europe. The recent
2004 Training and Development
Survey
from the CIPD
1
indicated
that 78 per cent of its UK survey
respondents reported using
coaching as part of their learning
and development activities.
However, the figures may not be as
high in other European countries.
Organisations that use coaching
have had a variety of experiences.
Although the use of coaching
for individuals within the
organisation may be on the
increase, organisations are still
challenged to create a coaching
culture to create a new way of
management. A few pioneers have
adopted this new style, but many
others are still struggling to find
ways of moving away from old
‘command and control’ habits.
This is especially the case within
the German-speaking world and
Eastern Europe – where organisa-
tions have yet to begin the journey.
The following success factors can
be used by organisations
themselves, or by external
coaching consultants assisting
organisations to develop a
coaching culture.
Success factor: link to the
business strategy
For example, if the business
strategy requires high growth, the
first question is ‘What is the
appropriate culture to enable the
high growth?’ In assessing their
current culture, organisations may
identify that they do not have a
‘high performance culture’ or
‘coaching culture’. The reasons for
this will certainly vary. Coaching
is by no means the ‘be all and end
all’, but it is certainly a critical
part of the picture. Without
leaders at all levels within the
organisation who can work with
their people to draw out their
greatest performance, high growth
will not be sustainable.
Success factor: identify a
sponsor
Any initiative that is linked to the
business strategy, and has
fundamental implications for the
culture of an organisation, needs
a sponsor within the organisation
to act as its champion. In the
ideal scenario, the sponsor is a
member of the board and/or a
highly respected top executive.
This may be a delicate issue; in
some organisations it is still
common for top executives to use
coaches but keep them hidden –
seeing coaching as for their private
benefit and a ‘secret weapon’ in
their arsenal for achieving
success within the organisation
and beyond. We have come
across a great variety of practices
and have been subject to instruc-
tions like ‘Never show your
business card at Reception.’
Of course, it is important for
individual coaches and
coaching organisations to respect
confidentiality. However, the
introduction of a coaching culture
will require those who have
experienced its benefits to become
willing advocates for the benefits
of coaching, rather than hiding
their coaches away. A good
sponsor will be someone who has
first-hand experience of coaching
and can see its benefits for the
wider organisation.
At a minimum, it is essential to
provide clear communication to
those who will most immediately
benefit – top executives who have
an allocated budget for coaching.
Coaching can be promoted in
feedback discussions during annual
appraisals and/or as an option that
is offered after a management
audit or assessment. It is important
to be clear about the steps the
executive needs to take in order to
enjoy executive coaching, and
about the budget allocation for
coaching – how much does the
company cover from centralised
budgets and what might need to be
covered by the business unit or the
department?
Success factor: integrate
coaching modules into the
leadership programme
Organisations that are committed
to creating a coaching culture go
one step further, and integrate
coaching modules into their
leadership development
programmes. External executive
coaches analyse the curriculum for
leadership development and work
with HR, the training division and
other trainers to ensure a well-
integrated approach so that the
leaders of an organisation are able
to adapt a coaching mindset. In
addition, some members of the
organisation may become fully
qualified coaches themselves.
However, roles and responsibilities
of internal and external coaches
need to be clearly defined. In
our experience, the top-executive
team remains best served by
external coaches.
Success factor: develop
evaluation strategies
We have come across a lack of
clarity about desired outcomes for
coaching. This leads to organisa-
tions being unclear about how to
evaluate coaches and the outcome
of specific coaching programmes.
Some are content with ‘happy
sheets’ – simple feedback about the
coaching relationship which
provides little more than a
statement that the coachee enjoyed
the coaching. Others like to have a
statement of to what extent the
goals set at the beginning were
met. Very few have started to
implement measures of ROI for
coaching. For example, at present
there is still a preconception in
some organisations that coaching
is too expensive. In absolute terms,
at first sight it may indeed be
cheaper to send executives on yet
another training programme. The
question should be ‘Expensive in
relation to what?’ It triggers us to
adapt the old management saying
‘If you think coaching is expensive,
try incompetence.’ The costs of
coaching have to be put into
perspective in relation to the
outcome. Measures of return of
experience and ROI become
critical to ensure support from the
top and future allocation of a
budget for executive coaching.
These have to be carefully
prepared, and it is essential to be
precise about the goal of the
coaching programme for the
organisation and the goals for each
individual coaching programme.
Only if the organisation and
coaches adhere to good practice
can good evaluation strategies be
developed.
The introduction of a coaching
culture to any organisation raises
the same challenges as other
culture change programmes. It is
not sufficient merely to announce
it, provide information and assume
that the change will take place.
Planning is essential to introduce
any new initiative. It is important
to examine all the costs and
benefits and to anticipate and plan
for resistance.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank international colleagues who inspired them with their writing, freely gave their
time and/or shared first-hand experiences and thoughts. Special thanks go to Diane Foster (USA), Stefan Oberli
(Switzerland), Hupert Krögler (Germany), Dr Fritsch (Germany) and Tim Price (UK).
Reference
1 The 2004 Training and Development Survey report is available to download from the CIPD website at
www.cipd.co.uk/surveys. See also Eric Parsloe and Jessica Rolph, ‘Coaching: Survey Respondents have
their Say’, Training Journal, pp. 36-38, June 2004.
Fiona Eldridge
is director of The Coaching and Communication Centre, a master
practitioner and a certified trainer of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP). She is also
a member of EMCC. Fiona has appeared on television and radio and is a frequent
contributor to newspapers and journals in the sphere of education.
The Coaching and Communication Centre
Telephone: +44 (0) 20 8347 2877
E-mail: enquiries@coachingandcommunication.com
Website: www.coachingandcommunication.com
Sabine Dembkowski
is based in Cologne, Germany. She is director of The Coaching
Centre. She trained as a coach with various institutions in the US (LoreInternational),
UK (School of Coaching) and Germany. Before becoming a coach she worked as a top
management consultant for A.T. Kearney and Monitor Company in London. Today she
supports leaders across Europe in organisations such as Roland Berger, Citibank,
Procter & Gamble, Metro, and Merck.
The Coaching Centre
Telephone: +49 (0) 221 285 9605
E-mail: sabinedembkowski@thecoachingcentre.com
Website: www.thecoachingcentre.com
pg_0002
major international coaching
organisations have defined
criteria and also operate a
professional code of ethics. Has
the coach completed just one
coach training, or have they been
through several programmes?
s
Description of a coaching
concept
– does the coach have a
coherent and proven coaching
concept which they utilise in
assignments?
s
Continuous education
– does
the coach invest on a continuous
basis in their own personal
development? What exactly
does the coach do to keep their
knowledge and performance
up to date?
s
Supervision
– does the coach
have supervision?
s
Experience as an executive
coach
– who does the coach
work for? At what level?
s
References
– there are
organisations that are satisfied
with a reference list, but many
choose to speak directly to the
reference organisations before
entering into a contract.
s
Adherence to ethical standards
does the coach belong to a well-
respected coaching organisation
such as the European Mentoring
and Coaching Council (EMCC),
and adhere to its ethical and
professional standards?
Success factor: create a
coach pool
Once coaches have met the criteria,
they are entered into a coach
pool. We have found that many
organisations prefer to operate a
pool arrangement so that individual
executives have a choice of coach.
In addition, should an initial
coaching relationship not work
for any reason, there are then
other coaches who can be brought
in without having to seek out new
individuals. To ensure efficiency of
the operation of a coach pool, it is
useful to define a standard for a
coach profile. Each individual coach
will have to fill in and submit a
standard form back to the organisa-
tion. When the HR department
receives a request for a coach, it is
then possible to complete some pre-
selection on the basis of the profiles.
A selection of profiles is then sent to
the interested executive. The next
step is to arrange a ‘get to know
each other’ meeting. Ultimately,
which coach is selected is the
decision of the individual executive.
A good coach pool database
contains information about, for
example, whom the coach has met
for a ‘get to know each other’
interview, conversion rate, and
feedback received from the
executives. Coaches with a good
standing within the database are
likely to be more actively promoted,
while those who do not receive
assignments may be stood down
from the list.
Success factor: active
communication with the
coach pool
Organisations who are serious about
developing a performance/coaching
culture seek active dialogue with
their coach pool. Regular meetings
are arranged two to three times a
year, at which representatives from
the organisation talk about recent
developments. These may include
new strategic directions, demands
and expectations conveyed to
executives, current initiatives (for
example, management audits),
and the key take-aways for the
organisation, plans for measuring
the return on investment (ROI)
for executive coaching and so on.
Coaches share the latest
developments in their community
and best-practice examples. In this
way a joint learning culture is
created and communication is
enhanced and maintained.
Success factor: ensure strict
confidentiality
It is pivotal for the coaching
relationship that the content of
coaching sessions is subject to
strict confidentiality between coach
and coachee. Those who initiate
coaching on the HR side can be
informed about the process and
general progress, but the content
is not revealed.
If it is known that information
about content is leaking through
the organisation, trust in the
instrument is broken. It would be
an extreme challenge to rebuild it.
The only time when a confidence
may be legitimately broken is in a
situation where the coachee reveals
illegal activity. The ground rules
concerning confidentiality need to
be underlined when establishing
the initial coaching contract – both
with the organisation and with the
individual.
Success factor: develop an
integrated communication plan
Once the organisation has
decided to offer coaching to the
executives, it needs to be
communicated actively within the
organisation. How coaching and
its benefits can be communicated is
a matter of creativity. We have
come across various practices,
ranging from displaying the offer
of external executive coaching on
the organisation’s intranet
(including a short video from the
sponsor in the organisation, in
which he stated how beneficial
coaching was for him and the
impact it had on his personal
corporate career), to clear
information in the annual
education programme and a slot
in the agenda of important
company events such as a quarterly
meeting (where a coach and a
coachee talked about their work).
Success factor: start offering
coaching at the top
All too often, coaching is regarded
as a method of fixing something that
is broken. In our experience, this is
particularly so within the German-
speaking world – where coaching may
be introduced to improve the
performance of under-performing
executives or as a precursor to
beginning capability proceedings.
When used in this way, coaching has
a problem orientation rather than a
solution orientation. In the UK and
USA the view is more balanced, and
organisations have started to realise
the benefit of utilising executive
coaches for the development of the
human potential of their top talents.
Starting at the top sends a strong
signal to the organisation and helps
to address preconceptions. In
addition, it has another significant
benefit: top executives and those with
high potential become role models
and essential multipliers of good
practice, which may eliminate
coaching requirements at middle-
management level.
Success factor: define quality
criteria and standards for selection
This is a major topic that could fill a
whole module in itself. The market
is supplied with an enormous number
of coaches. In Germany, for example,
it is estimated that there are about
30,000 to 50,000 individuals who
call themselves a coach. Each year
more coaches stream out into the
market from the many coaching
courses in existence. Of course, not
all target themselves at the corporate
market; many prefer to work with
individuals on personal issues as life
coaches. However, the corporate
sector is viewed as the most lucrative
to enter, and hence many new coaches
will be heading straight for the major
corporations on graduation from
their courses.
With time an ever-present pressure
within organisations, it is, of
course, tempting to use a familiar
face. Perhaps a successful trainer
within the organisation is now
offering coaching. There are benefits
here – the trainer will know the
organisation, its values and customs.
Coaching can be used as a very good
way of complementing training by
embedding the new learning in
practice.
However, cautionary tales abound,
and in conversations with those
responsible for selecting coaches we
have heard stories of coaches not
meeting the expectations of executives
and a whole new cohort of coaches
having to be appointed. It is
important to establish a clear set of
criteria when appointing your
coaches, to ensure that they meet
organisational and individual
executive expectations. Be very clear
about the intended outcomes of
coaching – for example, is it ‘nice to
have’ additional support for
executives which could be withdrawn
at short notice, or is it part of a wider
cultural change? The outcomes can,
and should, define the nature of the
coaches you choose.
There are a variety of criteria and
quality standards that organisations
have defined as needing to be met by
coaches. The most common ones we
have identified are listed below:
s
‘Fit’
– does the person fit into the
organisation?
s
Educational and professional
background
– has the coach skills
and experience of business which
will complement their coaching?
s
Coach training
– where was the
coach trained? Has the coach been
through a respected training
programme? Training programmes
are not yet standardised and there
is a major discussion about
standards for coach training. The
Creating a coaching culture: ten success factors for bringing it to life
Coach the Coach
Coach the Coach
there may be preconceptions about coaching
Within organisations